Innovative Pathways: When and how to use alternative approaches to Human Rights Impact Assessments
| dc.contributor.author | Brodeur, Caroline | |
| dc.contributor.author | Achterberg, Eline | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-21T20:28:57Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-21T20:28:57Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-02-21 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.21201/2025.000056 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10546/621669 | |
| dc.description | <html> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <p>Human rights violations are widespread across global supply chains, with companies increasingly exposed to risks like forced labor and environmental degradation. While audits and certifications have proven insufficient in preventing such abuses, a more robust approach is necessary. A Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA) is an essential tool that helps businesses identify and assess human rights risks by engaging directly with affected rightsholders. This process is becoming more critical, especially with new regulations like the EU's Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, which mandates comprehensive human rights and environmental due diligence (HREDD) for large companies starting in 2027.</p> <p>To make the HRIA process more efficient, some companies are exploring alternatives like joint HRIAs, sector-wide impact assessments, and rapid assessments. Joint HRIAs allow companies to share resources and expertise, especially when they source from the same suppliers or regions, while sector-wide assessments provide a broader view of industry-wide impacts. Rapid assessments are a faster alternative, focused on urgent or well-documented issues.</p> <p>Regardless of the approach, companies must adhere to key criteria to ensure effectiveness: selecting appropriate targets, engaging rightsholders meaningfully, addressing root causes, ensuring transparency, and committing to action. These principles ensure that the assessment process is thorough and leads to real, lasting improvements in human rights practices. Cutting corners in the due diligence process is not an option.</p> </body> </html> | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 14 | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Oxfam America | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Oxfam Novib | en_US |
| dc.relation.url | http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/innovative-pathways-when-and-how-to-use-alternative-approaches-to-human-rights-621669 | |
| dc.subject | Approach and methodology | en_US |
| dc.subject | Private sector | en_US |
| dc.title | Innovative Pathways: When and how to use alternative approaches to Human Rights Impact Assessments | en_US |
| dc.type | Briefing paper | en_US |
| oxfam.signoff.status | For public use. Can be shared outside Oxfam | en_US |
| oxfam.subject.keyword | Due diligence | en_US |
| oxfam.subject.keyword | Business | en_US |
| oxfam.subject.keyword | Human rights | en_US |
| oxfam.subject.keyword | Impact assessment | en_US |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2025-02-21T20:28:59Z |
Files in this item
Name:
bp-innovative-pathways-210225- ...
Size:
947.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
English Paper