Oxfam finds that for World Bank projects, many things can change during implementation. On average, actual expenditures on the Bank’s projects differ from budgeted amounts by 26–43% above or below the claimed climate finance. Across the entire climate finance portfolio, between 2017 and 2023, this difference amounts to US$24.28–US$41.32 billion. No information is available about what new climate actions were supported and which planned actions were cut. 

Now that the Bank has touted its focus on understanding and reporting on the impacts of its climate finance, it is critical to stress that without a full understanding of how much of what the Bank claims as climate finance at the project approval stage becomes actual expenditure, it is impossible to track and measure the impacts of the Bank's climate co-benefits in practice. 

The Bank should improve its reporting practices, undertake a climate finance assessment on closed projects, standardize how it reports on climate finance in projects and create a public climate finance database.  

A webinar was hosted on October 17, 2024 to launch this report and you can access the recording here.

This page was updated on November 2, 2024 to address an error in the accompanying data. This change has no impact on the findings of the report.

Oxfam's report sought to highlight the need for greater transparency around impacts, and to encourage post-project assessments. No claim was made of missing money, despite some misinterpretations of our findings. Read more here: 8 questions you had about Oxfam's World Bank climate finance report - answered