• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Oxfam Digital RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountryThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    About

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Forever fields: studying knowledge practices in the global North: a view from the global South

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author(s)
    Kanagasabai, Nithila
    Editor(s)
    Ghosh, Anandita
    Publication date
    2023-12-12
    Subject
    Gender
    Keywords
    Research ethics
    Field
    Feminist knowledge production
    Global South
    Feminist academia
    Forever fields
    Decolonisation
    Country
    India
    United States
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher(s)
    Routledge
    Oxfam KEDV
    Oxfam Brazil
    Oxfam Colombia
    Oxfam India
    Oxfam Mexico
    Oxfam South Africa
    Journal
    Gender & Development
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10546/621558
    DOI
    10.1080/13552074.2023.2261765
    Document type
    Journal article
    Language
    English
    Description
    <html> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <p>While there is a multitude of academic work with respect to cross-border collaborations between South Asian countries and the US, almost all of it is produced by scholars located in US universities, either as tenured faculty or as doctoral students. Much of this work is predicated upon the access these scholars have to stakeholders in both countries, which is dependent on the predominantly one-way flow of gaze/theory from the global North. Based on in-depth interviews with Indian doctoral scholars enrolled in Women&#8217;s Studies and allied disciplines in universities in the US, but whose research fields are in India, this paper examines the ways in which coloniality structures the knowledges thus produced. Particularly, it examines how the construction of the &#8216;field&#8217; is contingent upon complex processes such as visa regimes, funding opportunities to travel, and disciplinary framings. It argues that despite the increased focus on a globalised academia and movement of scholars and students around the world, material inequities continue to frame certain locations as &#8216;forever fields&#8217;. Finally, unpacking the politics of mapping a field, it poses the possibility of activating a disruption in the ways in which the category &#8216;field&#8217; is perceived.</p> </body> </html>
    Pages
    17
    ISSN
    1355-2074
    EISSN
    1364-9221
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1080/13552074.2023.2261765
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Journal articles

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export button (to the right?) will allow you to export the search results of the entered query to a CSV file. To export the items, click the "Export" button.

    There are two options to select the items you want to export to a CSV. Either you export all results from a search query, or you select a subset of items from the search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" in the Export menu.

    After making a selection, click the 'CSV' button. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to 'CSV'.

    The amount of items you can export is limited, but authenticating will increase this limit.