Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDixit, Anukriti
dc.contributor.authorBanday, Muneeb Ul Lateef
dc.contributor.editorSatija, Shivani
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T12:08:41Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T12:08:41Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-07
dc.identifier.issn1355-2074
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13552074.2022.2117930
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/621458
dc.description<html> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <p>The digital economy is seen as the latest phase in the socioeconomic development trajectory. There has been a proliferation of policy documents on ensuring gendered inclusion and addressing the &#8216;gender gap&#8217; in the digital economy. Particularly in the context of the &#8216;third world&#8217;, there are large volumes of &#8216;evidence&#8217; reported linking economic welfare through digital inclusion and gender equality. Drawing from capabilities, intersectionality, and decolonial scholarship, we analyse how the problem of the &#8216;gender gap&#8217; in the &#8216;digital economy&#8217; is constituted through particular discourses. We employ an approach termed &#8216;problematisation&#8217;, which contends that policies produce and articulate &#8216;problems&#8217; in specific ways rather than solve pre-ordained &#8216;problems&#8217;. We take &#8216;problem&#8217; and &#8216;solution&#8217; articulations within the most recent reports by multilateral governance bodies, including the World Bank, UN Women, and the World Economic Forum (WEF), among others. Our findings indicate that digital gender gap policies are formulated through interlinking assumptions of the capabilities approach with neoliberal rationality. Accordingly, the &#8216;gender gap&#8217; is produced as a problem of rights and economic development to be solved through neoliberal &#8216;empowerment&#8217; and &#8216;entrepreneurship&#8217;. In an attempt to produce universal cross-cultural frameworks, these policy documents ignore the intersectionality of gendered power relations and reproduce colonial frameworks of development, modernity, and progress. The latter is accomplished through the technologies of statistical scientificity (generalised causality) and temporality (&#8216;developed versus developing&#8217; discourses of modernity). We, therefore, argue that developmental policymaking, particularly the capabilities approach, must incorporate intersectionality and decoloniality to be effective, inclusive, and unsettle colonial universalisation.</p> </body> </html>en_US
dc.format.extent21en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherOxfam KEDVen_US
dc.publisherOxfam Indiaen_US
dc.publisherOxfam Colombiaen_US
dc.publisherOxfam Mexicoen_US
dc.publisherOxfam South Africaen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.publisherOxfam Brazilen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/problematising-the-digital-gender-gap-invoking-decoloniality-and-intersectional-621458
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.titleProblematising the digital gender gap: invoking decoloniality and intersectionality for inclusive policymakingen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9221
dc.identifier.journalGender & Developmenten_US
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use. Can be shared outside Oxfamen_US
oxfam.subject.keywordDigital gender gapen_US
oxfam.subject.keywordintersectionalityen_US
oxfam.subject.keyworddecolonialityen_US
oxfam.subject.keywordempowermenten_US
oxfam.subject.keyworddevelopmenten_US
prism.issuenameWomen, work, and the digital economyen_US
prism.number3en_US
prism.volume30en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record