• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Research reports & discussion papers
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Research reports & discussion papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Oxfam Digital RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountryThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    About

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Faecal Sludge Management for Disaster Relief: Technology Comparison Study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    rr-faecal-sludge-management-cx ...
    Size:
    4.989Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    English report
    Download
    Publication date
    2020-02-04
    Subject
    Conflict and disasters
    Humanitarian
    Water, sanitation and hygiene
    Keywords
    Faecal sludge management
    Country
    Bangladesh
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher(s)
    Arup
    Oxfam
    UNHCR
    Document type
    Research report
    Description

    This report presents the findings of a study conducted by Arup on behalf of Oxfam to assess different faecal sludge management (FSM) methods at the Rohingya camps close to Cox's Bazar (CXB), Bangladesh. The aim of the study was to draw conclusions on best practices in FSM for disaster relief from evidence gathered through practical experience. 

    The researchers visited over 20 operational FSM sites in CXB. These sites had been built by eight different NGOs and were using eight different FSM technologies. The researchers compared the technologies against a set of indicators, including cost; footprint area; speed of construction and commissioning; operation and maintenance issues; pathogen inactivation and resilience to natural disasters. 

    A key finding from the study was that adequate allowances and resources should be allocated for the full faecal sludge treatment process. This must include liquid and solids management and final disposal.

    Pages
    100
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10546/620943
    Additional Links
    http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/faecal-sludge-management-for-disaster-relief-technology-comparison-study-620943
    Collections
    Research reports & discussion papers

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export button (to the right?) will allow you to export the search results of the entered query to a CSV file. To export the items, click the "Export" button.

    There are two options to select the items you want to export to a CSV. Either you export all results from a search query, or you select a subset of items from the search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" in the Export menu.

    After making a selection, click the 'CSV' button. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to 'CSV'.

    The amount of items you can export is limited, but authenticating will increase this limit.