• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Case studies & programme insights
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Case studies & programme insights
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Oxfam Digital RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountryThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    About

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Sharing Oxfam’s Experience of Using Two Approaches for Network Assessment: Social Network Analysis and Qualitative Assessment Scorecard

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    gt-sharing-oxfams-experience-n ...
    Size:
    281.3Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    English guide
    Download
    Author(s)
    Semaan, Joelle
    Stewart, Alastair
    Publication date
    2017-11-29
    Subject
    Approach and methodology
    Keywords
    Monitoring and evaluation
    Social networks
    Social Network Analysis (SNA)
    Qualitative Assessment Scorecard (QAS)
    Influencing
    Advocacy
    South Caucasus
    Country
    Armenia
    Georgia
    Lebanon
    Viet Nam
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher(s)
    Oxfam GB
    Document type
    Guidelines and toolkits
    Description

    In this paper, the authors share Oxfam’s experience of using and adapting two approaches to network assessment: Social Network Analysis (SNA) and Qualitative Assessment Scorecard (QAS). Network assessments are useful throughout the lifetime of a network for different purposes: at network formation stage, the design of influencing and advocacy interventions and for the monitoring and evaluation of a network’s contribution to change.

    Drawing on the experiences of teams in the South Caucasus, Vietnam and Lebanon, this step-by-step guide has been produced to answer frequently asked questions (FAQs) about how and when to use SNA and QAS. It contains links to useful resources that are available free and online. The hope is that colleagues and practitioners creating or supporting ‘networks for change’ will recognize their good practice and feel more confident and inspired to find out more about how these approaches could be adapted to suit their network’s needs and objectives.

    Pages
    12
    DOI
    10.21201/2017.1152
    ISBN
    978-1-78748-115-2
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10546/620386
    Additional Links
    http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/sharing-oxfams-experience-of-using-two-approaches-for-network-assessment-social-620386
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.21201/2017.1152
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Case studies & programme insights

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export button (to the right?) will allow you to export the search results of the entered query to a CSV file. To export the items, click the "Export" button.

    There are two options to select the items you want to export to a CSV. Either you export all results from a search query, or you select a subset of items from the search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" in the Export menu.

    After making a selection, click the 'CSV' button. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to 'CSV'.

    The amount of items you can export is limited, but authenticating will increase this limit.