Measuring Impact: A Meta-Analysis of Oxfam's Livelihoods Effectiveness Reviews
Author(s)
Fuller, RobertPublication date
2017-11-08Subject
Food and livelihoodsKeywords
AgricultureEconomic growth
Livelihoods
Smallholder agriculture
Enterprise development
Food production
Monitoring and evaluation
Research methods
Sustainable livelihoods approach
Value chain
Welfare
Women farmers
Women's economic leadership
Impact evaluation
Quasi-experimental evaluation
Propensity score matching
Meta-analysis
Country
ArmeniaThe Democratic Republic of Congo
Guatemala
Haiti
Honduras
Indonesia
Liberia
Mali
Nicaragua
Philippines
Uganda
Vietnam
Zimbabwe
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher(s)
Oxfam GBSeries
Effectiveness ReviewsDocument type
Research reportDescription
This paper presents the results of a meta-analysis examining the overall impact of 23 livelihoods projects evaluated as part of Oxfam GB's Effectiveness Reviews between 2011 and 2016.
Results show a statistically significant, positive impact on the welfare of participants, measured by household consumption and wealth. Analysis indicates an increase in household consumption of approximately 6.6% (95% confidence interval from 1.6% to 11.9%). While some projects had more positive results than others, these differences are not explained by regions, whether the country has lower-income or middle-income status, whether households were initially poorer than average, nor by project scale, budget or duration.
However, there is some evidence that female-headed households have tended to benefit less from the projects than male-headed households. Projects that targeted a specific agricultural product or products (such as vegetables, coffee or dairy production) were generally found to be successful in promoting production and sales.