• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Oxfam Digital RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountryThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    About

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Still learning: a critical reflection on three years of measuring women's empowerment in Oxfam

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author(s)
    Bishop, David
    Bowman, Kimberly
    Editor(s)
    Sweetman, Caroline
    Publication date
    2014-07-09
    Subject
    Gender
    Keywords
    Gender mainstreaming
    Impact evaluation
    Empowerment
    Women's rights
    Monitoring and evaluation
    M&E
    Gender and Development Journal
    GaD
    Country
    Nigeria
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher(s)
    Oxfam GB
    Routledge
    Journal
    Gender & Development
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10546/322261
    DOI
    10.1080/13552074.2014.920993
    Document type
    Journal article
    Language
    English
    Description
    In 2011, as part of a broader effort to understand organisational effectiveness, a team within Oxfam GB began implementing impact evaluations on a small sample of projects largely focused on women's empowerment. The resulting ‘Women's Empowerment Effectiveness Reviews’ employ a quasi-experimental evaluation design, and have been undertaken in more than a dozen sites over three years. This article briefly presents the Women's Empowerment Effectiveness Reviews and their short history, then focuses on five key areas where the approach has presented limitations. Acknowledging that there remains room for improvement, the project has also been a major step forward for Oxfam's monitoring, evaluation, and learning practice. Through this critical reflection, we aim to share some learning to date. This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis. For the full table of contents for this and previous issues of this journal, please visit the <a href="http://www.genderanddevelopment.org">Gender and Development</a> website.
    Pages
    16
    ISSN
    1355-2074
    EISSN
    1364-9221
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1080/13552074.2014.920993
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Journal articles

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export button (to the right?) will allow you to export the search results of the entered query to a CSV file. To export the items, click the "Export" button.

    There are two options to select the items you want to export to a CSV. Either you export all results from a search query, or you select a subset of items from the search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" in the Export menu.

    After making a selection, click the 'CSV' button. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to 'CSV'.

    The amount of items you can export is limited, but authenticating will increase this limit.