Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLenfant, Francois*
dc.contributor.authorRutten, Rens*
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-08T16:22:18Zen
dc.date.available2013-03-08T16:22:18Zen
dc.date.issued2013-02-18en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614524.2013.753412en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/271576en
dc.descriptionIn 2007, Cordaid started a pilot on participatory impact assessment, intended to enhance accountability and to improve learning. The methodology was based on quasi-experimental design, complemented with qualitative research. This case study illustrates the challenges INGOs and their partners face in their attempt to find a rigorous yet, relevant, useful, and socially acceptable methodology for evaluation and impact assessment purposes. While most local NGOs participating in this pilot consider (parts of) this methodology useful for their learning, this approach proves unsuitable, costly, and inappropriate for an INGO such as Cordaid since it does not respond to its own accountability and learning needs.en
dc.format.extent11en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/cordaids-experience-with-impact-evaluation-271576
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.titleCordaid's experience with impact evaluationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.keywordINGOs
oxfam.subject.keywordImpact assessment
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
prism.number1en
prism.volume23en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record