Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWordofa, Dereje*
dc.contributor.editorSweetman, Carolineen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T10:12:55Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T10:12:55Zen
dc.date.issued2004-05-01en
dc.identifier.issn1355-2074en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13552070410001726536en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/131539en
dc.descriptionHow does a lack of consideration to gender and diversity restrict the success of implementing poverty-reduction policies? What are the lessons to be learned from past mistakes and omissions? This article examines the Uganda Participatory Poverty Assessment Process (UPPAP), which fed into Uganda's Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP). The UPPAP process involved the participation of people whose identities often cause them to be marginalised. Useful lessons can be learned from this experience. This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis. For the full table of contents for this and previous issues of this journal, please visit the <a href="http://www.genderanddevelopment.org">Gender and Development</a> website.en
dc.format.extent7en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/poverty-reduction-policy-responses-to-gender-and-social-diversity-in-uganda-131539
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.subjectEconomics
dc.subjectGender
dc.titlePoverty-reduction policy responses to gender and social diversity in Ugandaen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9221en
dc.identifier.journalGender & Developmenten
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.countryUgandaen
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordFinance
oxfam.subject.keywordGender and Development Journal
oxfam.subject.keywordGaD
prism.issuenameDiversityen
prism.number1en
prism.volume12en
dc.year.issuedate2004en
dc.year.issuedate2004en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record