Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMsukwa, C A P S*
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Dan*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T10:05:30Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T10:05:30Zen
dc.date.issued2011-02-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614524.2011.530244en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/131175en
dc.descriptionThe adoption of techniques to elicit community participation in development practice is an important step forward. The question remains whether this is sufficient for development outcomes that accord with the aspirations of 'participants'. Community perceptions are somewhat different, as our own conclusions demonstrate. We have developed a 'methodology of inclusiveness', based on community institutions which embed collective social action in everyday life. We use the analogy of funerals as collective action in which activities are planned, roles are demarcated, responsibilities are assigned, and desired outcomes are realised. We ask the question: why can't development be managed more like a funeral?<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>en
dc.format.extent13en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/why-cant-development-be-managed-more-like-a-funeral-challenging-participatory-p-131175
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.titleWhy can't development be managed more like a funeral? Challenging participatory practicesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment in Practice Journal
oxfam.subject.keywordDiP
prism.number1en
prism.volume21en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record