• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Oxfam Digital RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountryThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    About

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Appraisal of methods to evaluate farmer field schools

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author(s)
    Mancini, Francesca
    Jiggins, Janice
    Editor(s)
    Eade, Deborah
    Publication date
    2008-08-01
    Subject
    Food and livelihoods
    Approach and methodology
    Keywords
    Agriculture
    Development methods
    Livelihoods
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher(s)
    Oxfam GB
    Routledge
    Journal
    Development in Practice
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10546/130983
    DOI
    10.1080/09614520802181277
    Document type
    Journal article
    Language
    English
    Description
    The need to increase agricultural sustainability has induced the government of India to promote the adoption of integrated pest management (IPM). An evaluation of cotton-based conventional and IPM farming systems was conducted in India (2002-2004). The farmers managing the IPM farms had participated in discovery-based ecological training, namely Farmer Field Schools (FFS). The evaluation included five impact areas: (1) the ecological footprint and (2) occupational hazard of cotton production; and the effects of IPM adoption on (3) labour allocation; (4) management practices; and (5) livelihoods. The analysis showed that a mix of approaches increased the depth and the relevance of the findings. Participatory and conventional methods were complementary. The study also revealed different impacts on the livelihoods of women and men, and wealthy and poor farmers, and demonstrated that the value of the experience can be captured also in terms of the farmers' own frames of reference. The evaluation process consumed considerable resources, indicating that proper budgetary allocations need to be made.
    Pages
    11
    ISSN
    0961-4524
    EISSN
    1364-9213
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1080/09614520802181277
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Journal articles

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export button (to the right?) will allow you to export the search results of the entered query to a CSV file. To export the items, click the "Export" button.

    There are two options to select the items you want to export to a CSV. Either you export all results from a search query, or you select a subset of items from the search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" in the Export menu.

    After making a selection, click the 'CSV' button. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to 'CSV'.

    The amount of items you can export is limited, but authenticating will increase this limit.