Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBhukuth, Augendra*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T10:00:42Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T10:00:42Zen
dc.date.issued2008-06-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614520802030466en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130947en
dc.descriptionWhile it is internationally agreed that the worst forms of child labour should be eliminated in order to promote children's welfare, the consensus breaks down when trying to define what constitutes 'light work'. This article seeks to show why it is difficult to get everyone to agree on this issue, focusing on the definition of child labour proposed by the International Labour Organization (ILO).<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>en
dc.format.extent9en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/defining-child-labour-a-controversial-debate-130947
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.titleDefining child labour: a controversial debateen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordLabour standards
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment in Practice Journal
oxfam.subject.keywordDiP
prism.number3en
prism.volume18en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record