Defining child labour: a controversial debate
dc.contributor.author | Bhukuth, Augendra | * |
dc.contributor.editor | Eade, Deborah | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-24T10:00:42Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2011-05-24T10:00:42Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2008-06-01 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0961-4524 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/09614520802030466 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10546/130947 | en |
dc.description | While it is internationally agreed that the worst forms of child labour should be eliminated in order to promote children's welfare, the consensus breaks down when trying to define what constitutes 'light work'. This article seeks to show why it is difficult to get everyone to agree on this issue, focusing on the definition of child labour proposed by the International Labour Organization (ILO).<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p> | en |
dc.format.extent | 9 | en |
dc.format.mimetype | en | |
dc.language.iso | English | en |
dc.publisher | Oxfam GB | en |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en |
dc.relation.url | http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/defining-child-labour-a-controversial-debate-130947 | |
dc.subject | Approach and methodology | |
dc.title | Defining child labour: a controversial debate | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1364-9213 | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Development in Practice | en |
oxfam.signoff.status | For public use – can be shared outside Oxfam | en |
oxfam.subject.keyword | Development methods | |
oxfam.subject.keyword | Labour standards | |
oxfam.subject.keyword | Development in Practice Journal | |
oxfam.subject.keyword | DiP | |
prism.number | 3 | en |
prism.volume | 18 | en |