• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Oxfam Digital RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountryThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    About

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Accountability, autonomy, and authenticity: assessing the development waltz conducted to a 'kwaito' beat in Southern Africa

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author(s)
    Abrahams, Mark A
    Editor(s)
    Eade, Deborah
    Publication date
    2008-02-01
    Subject
    Approach and methodology
    Keywords
    Monitoring and evaluation
    M&E
    Development methods
    Development in Practice Journal
    DiP
    Country
    South Africa
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher(s)
    Oxfam GB
    Routledge
    Journal
    Development in Practice
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10546/130919
    DOI
    10.1080/09614520701778348
    Document type
    Journal article
    Language
    English
    Description
    For the purposes of accountability and uniformity, and as a way of giving insight into their intellectual capital regarding development practices, NGOs in Southern Africa are required by donor agencies to describe their intended activities in very clear, unambiguous terms. These requirements may include the expression of theoretical approaches, the development of logical frameworks, clear objectives, indicators for success, criteria for sustainable development, and relationships to government policies. However, the interface between reality and these planning measures and tools, most often completed without the input and contributions of the communities whom they are to serve/service, produces a much more messy, dynamic, and involved picture of the development process. None the less, the NGOs are still required to be accountable on the basis of their original proposal and planning. The author presents examples of this phenomenon and discusses the challenges facing an evaluator when dealing with competing principles of accountability, autonomy, and authenticity.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>
    Pages
    12
    ISSN
    0961-4524
    EISSN
    1364-9213
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1080/09614520701778348
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Journal articles

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export button (to the right?) will allow you to export the search results of the entered query to a CSV file. To export the items, click the "Export" button.

    There are two options to select the items you want to export to a CSV. Either you export all results from a search query, or you select a subset of items from the search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" in the Export menu.

    After making a selection, click the 'CSV' button. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to 'CSV'.

    The amount of items you can export is limited, but authenticating will increase this limit.