Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBalchin, Cassandra*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T09:59:25Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T09:59:25Zen
dc.date.issued2007-08-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614520701469500en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130882en
dc.descriptionThis article questions the growing use of the term 'faith-based' in development policy and practice. It is argued that it homogenises people in minority migrant and developing-country contexts and excludes many who are working for human rights and social justice from secular perspectives, thus providing an unsound analytical base for policy. Against the background of the 'war on terror', the author also examines the differences in US and British development policy arising out of the term 'faith-based'.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>en
dc.format.extent6en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/the-f-word-and-the-s-word---too-much-of-one-and-not-enough-of-the-other-130882
dc.subjectConflict and disasters
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.titleThe F-word and the S-word - too much of one and not enough of the otheren
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.countryUnited Kingdomen
oxfam.subject.countryUnited Statesen
oxfam.subject.keywordConflict
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordDisasters
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment in Practice Journal
oxfam.subject.keywordDiP
prism.issuenameBuzzwords and Fuzzwords: Deconstructing development discourseen
prism.number4 & 5en
prism.volume17en
dc.year.issuedate2007en
dc.year.issuedate2007en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record