Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNevile, Ann*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T09:58:43Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T09:58:43Zen
dc.date.issued2007-04-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614520701197200en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130848en
dc.descriptionAndries Du Toit (2004) argues that the concept of social exclusion has limited use in the field of development studies, since chronic poverty is often the result of incorporation on particularly disadvantageous terms ('adverse incorporation') rather than any process of exclusion. Du Toit therefore advocates going beyond thinking about 'exclusion' and 'inclusion' in binary terms and looking more closely at how different kinds of power are formed and maintained. This article argues that thinking about social exclusion has already moved beyond a simple 'included/excluded' dichotomy, and that use of Sen's analytical framework assists researchers to tease out the complex, interconnected factors underlying chronic poverty, such as that experienced by agricultural workers in South Africa's Western Cape district of Ceres.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>en
dc.format.extent7en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/amartya-k-sen-and-social-exclusion-130848
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.titleAmartya K. Sen and social exclusionen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.countrySouth Africaen
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment in Practice Journal
oxfam.subject.keywordDiP
prism.number2en
prism.volume17en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record