Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCavalcanti, Joabe*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T09:58:23Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T09:58:23Zen
dc.date.issued2007-02-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614520601092253en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130830en
dc.descriptionThis article discusses the meaning of development from a post-development perspective, based on a case study of a goat-keeping project involving a small community of farmers from a rural town in north-east Brazil. The development project was fraught with conflicting views of development as it sought to impose an interventionist, ethnocentric, and modernist view of what was best for the community, even stipulating how the farmers should work together. The modernist interpretation has been criticised on various grounds, but nevertheless continues to condition how the 'development industry' defines its values and views its mission.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>en
dc.format.extent8en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/development-versus-enjoyment-of-life-a-post-development-critique-of-the-develop-130830
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.titleDevelopment versus enjoyment of life: a post-development critique of the developmentalist worldviewen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.countryBrazilen
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment in Practice Journal
oxfam.subject.keywordDiP
prism.number1en
prism.volume17en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record