Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCopestake, James*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T09:53:52Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T09:53:52Zen
dc.date.issued2003-11-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0961452032000125929en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130604en
dc.descriptionBased on 'The role of horizontal networks in microfinance impact monitoring and assessment'. This paper draws on five case studies to explore potential benefits and barriers to horizontal networking to promote impact monitoring and assessment of microfinance. Its main aim is to stimulate further discussion of this issue, but it also draws tentative conclusions about factors likely to contribute towards success. In particular, experience from Honduras suggests that network organisations can work most effectively when they facilitate wider use of impact assessment (IA) activities already piloted by a lead member of the network.en
dc.format.extent5en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/practical-notes-130604
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.titlePractical Notesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.keywordMicrofinance
oxfam.subject.keywordMonitoring and evaluation
oxfam.subject.keywordM&E
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
prism.number5en
prism.volume13en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record