Logical Framework Approach and PRA - mutually exclusive or complementary tools for project planning?
| dc.contributor.author | Aune, Jens | * |
| dc.contributor.editor | Eade, Deborah | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-24T09:50:56Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2011-05-24T09:50:56Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2000-11-01 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0961-4524 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/09614520020008850 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10546/130447 | en |
| dc.description | The paper presents the major differences between the approaches to project planning known as Logical Framework Approach (LFA) and Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) and discusses whether these can be used in a complementary fashion. It is suggested that LFA be used to provide the overall structure of the planning process while PRA may be used in discussions and to place decision making at the grassroots.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p> | en |
| dc.format.extent | 4 | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | en | |
| dc.language.iso | English | en |
| dc.publisher | Oxfam GB | en |
| dc.publisher | Routledge | en |
| dc.relation.url | http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/logical-framework-approach-and-pra---mutually-exclusive-or-complementary-tools-130447 | |
| dc.subject | Approach and methodology | |
| dc.title | Logical Framework Approach and PRA - mutually exclusive or complementary tools for project planning? | en |
| dc.type | Journal article | en |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1364-9213 | en |
| dc.identifier.journal | Development in Practice | en |
| oxfam.signoff.status | For public use – can be shared outside Oxfam | en |
| oxfam.subject.keyword | Development methods | |
| oxfam.subject.keyword | Development in Practice Journal | |
| oxfam.subject.keyword | DiP | |
| prism.number | 5 | en |
| prism.volume | 10 | en |