Formal RoSCAs in Argentina
| dc.contributor.author | Schreiner, Mark | * |
| dc.contributor.editor | Eade, Deborah | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-24T09:50:31Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2011-05-24T09:50:31Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2000-05-01 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0961-4524 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/09614520050010269 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10546/130424 | en |
| dc.description | This paper describes the relative advantages and disadvantages of formal Rotating Savings and Credit Associations (RoSCAs), in contrast with informal RoSCAs, as seen in Argentina. NGOs, it is argued, are not in a good position to use the formal RoSCA structure to developmental advantage, since they could not manage the risk assessment or legal framework necessary with formal RoSCAs, which do not rely on social censure and capital for their operation.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p> | en |
| dc.format.extent | 4 | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | en | |
| dc.language.iso | English | en |
| dc.publisher | Oxfam GB | en |
| dc.publisher | Routledge | en |
| dc.relation.url | http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/formal-roscas-in-argentina-130424 | |
| dc.subject | Approach and methodology | |
| dc.subject | Economics | |
| dc.title | Formal RoSCAs in Argentina | en |
| dc.type | Journal article | en |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1364-9213 | en |
| dc.identifier.journal | Development in Practice | en |
| oxfam.signoff.status | For public use – can be shared outside Oxfam | en |
| oxfam.subject.country | Argentina | en |
| oxfam.subject.keyword | Development methods | |
| oxfam.subject.keyword | Finance | |
| oxfam.subject.keyword | Development in Practice Journal | |
| oxfam.subject.keyword | DiP | |
| prism.number | 2 | en |
| prism.volume | 10 | en |
| dc.year.issuedate | 2000 | en |