Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPinder, Richard*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T09:50:04Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T09:50:04Zen
dc.date.issued1999-02-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614529953304en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130399en
dc.descriptionUsing the example of a project in Sheffield intended to promote user-involvement and participation in planning healthcare services, the author criticises the failure of the project to actually provide any forum for user-participation. The structures used to set up these partnerships are often too prescriptive, he argues, setting out a framework in which consultation may take place, and leaving no room for legitimate local interests which may not fit this framework. This article also appears in the Development in Practice Reader Development and Management.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>en
dc.format.extent5en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/whose-terms-observations-on-development-management-in-an-english-city-130399
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.subjectHealth
dc.titleWhose terms? Observations on 'development management' in an English cityen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.countryUnited Kingdomen
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordParticipation
oxfam.subject.keywordHealth promotion
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment in Practice Journal
oxfam.subject.keywordDiP
prism.issuenameDevelopment Management in Practiceen
prism.number1 & 2en
prism.volume9en
dc.year.issuedate1999en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record