Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNeumayer, Eric*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T09:49:40Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T09:49:40Zen
dc.date.issued1999-11-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614529952710en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130377en
dc.descriptionA fundamental question to be decided at the November/December 1999 World Trade Organisation (WTO) ministerial meeting is whether to support or resist a new round of trade negotiations. The author argues that while many developing countries, and development NGOs, are right to feel that the earlier Uruguay round produced results skewed in favour of developed countries, there is nothing to be gained from resisting a new round: rather, developing countries should signal their willingness to get involved, but only if certain conditions are met. `Constructive, but critical, support' is the only way to realise benefits and avoid further marginalisation.en
dc.format.extent4en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/developing-countries-in-the-wto-support-or-resist-the-millennium-round-130377
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.subjectTrade
dc.titleDeveloping countries in the WTO: support or resist the 'millennium' round?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.keywordTrade policy
oxfam.subject.keywordWorld Trade Organisation
oxfam.subject.keywordWTO
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
prism.number5en
prism.volume9en
dc.year.issuedate1999en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record