Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLocke, Catherine*
dc.contributor.authorOkali, Christine*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T09:49:12Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T09:49:12Zen
dc.date.issued1999-05-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614529953016en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130353en
dc.descriptionMajor conceptual advances in thinking about gender relations suggest the need to reassess conventional gender analyses within the context of development interventions. Evidence from development practice supports the conviction that 'targeting' can be undermined by processes of gendered bargaining around project interventions. Academic research points to key problems and potential methods for looking at changes in gender relations that might be adapted to project contexts. Existing gender planning frameworks focus on shifts in gender relations but need also to address the process whereby gender relations are re-negotiated if they are to inform better planning, monitoring, and evaluation.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>en
dc.format.extent13en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/analysing-changing-gender-relations-methodological-challenges-for-gender-planni-130353
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.subjectGender
dc.titleAnalysing changing gender relations: methodological challenges for gender planningen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordGender mainstreaming
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment in Practice Journal
oxfam.subject.keywordDiP
prism.number3en
prism.volume9en
dc.year.issuedate1999en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record