Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan Brabant, Koenraad*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T09:48:32Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T09:48:32Zen
dc.date.issued1998-05-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614529853837en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130320en
dc.descriptionThe author identifies three key weaknesses in the debate leading up to establishing the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) for the European Union (EU). The process started in 1996 and a generally useful and relevant discussion has taken place between various governmental and non-governmental actors concerning conflict-prevention and structural stability. The author believes there must be further consideration of inconsistencies in international policy, the incoherence of the view that conflict and structural instability are essentially problems of the `South', and the tendency to analyse only countries where conflict has broken out, ignoring those where the potential for violence existed, but was avoided.en
dc.format.extent4en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/analysis-and-advocacy-on-a-european-policy-on-conflict-prevention-a-viewpoint-130320
dc.subjectConflict and disasters
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.titleAnalysis and advocacy on a European policy on conflict prevention: a viewpointen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.keywordConflict
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordDisasters
prism.number2en
prism.volume8en
dc.year.issuedate1998en
dc.year.issuedate1998en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record