Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAger, Alastair*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T09:48:02Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T09:48:02Zen
dc.date.issued1997-11-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614529754198en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130294en
dc.descriptionBased on 'Tensions in the psychosocial discourse: implications for the planning of interventions with war-affected populations'. Fundamental conceptual tensions underlie current debates regarding the implementation of psychosocial interventions with war-affected populations. Three particular tensions structuring current discourse concern the generalisability versus uniqueness of relevant knowledge, the valuing of technical versus indigenous understandings, and the planning of targeted versus community-based intervention. The implications of working out these tensions in the implementation of programmes are explored, leading to the proposal of a model of phased response to psychosocial needs.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>en
dc.format.extent6en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/feedback-130294
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.titleFeedbacken
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment in Practice Journal
oxfam.subject.keywordDiP
prism.number4en
prism.volume7en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record