For better? For worse? Humanitarian aid in conflict

Author(s)
Bryer, David
Cairns, Edmund
Editor(s)
Eade, Deborah
Publication date
1997-11-01
Subject
Humanitarian
Aid
Approach and methodology
Governance and citizenship
Keywords
Humanitarian practice
Development methods

Metadata
Show full item record
Publisher(s)
Oxfam GB
Routledge
Journal
Development in Practice
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10546/130286
DOI
10.1080/09614529754152
Document type
Journal article
Language
English
Description
Humanitarian aid should be judged against international humanitarian law (IHL) which gives civilians certain rights, including protection in armed conflicts. Aid agencies should consider the various side-effects of their interventions in order to assess the net impact, and decide whether to work in any given situation. They have no responsibility to provide aid where the net impact is negative, or to those who violate international law. If governments fail in their responsibilities to protect civilians, this does not give aid agencies the responsibility of filling the vacuum, but does mean that they should campaign for governments to act. Current Northern debate on support for the citizens of countries that are in conflict is usually expressed in terms of charity, rather than a response to what people are doing for themselves. Aid agencies should help to change this.
Pages
12
ISSN
0961-4524
EISSN
1364-9213
Collections