• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Oxfam Digital RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountryThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    About

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Participation in social forestry re-examined: a case-study from Bangladesh

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author(s)
    Ahmed Khan, Niaz
    Ara Begum, Showkat
    Editor(s)
    Eade, Deborah
    Publication date
    1997-08-01
    Subject
    Approach and methodology
    Keywords
    Development methods
    Participation
    Development in Practice Journal
    DiP
    Country
    Bangladesh
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher(s)
    Oxfam GB
    Routledge
    Journal
    Development in Practice
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10546/130262
    DOI
    10.1080/09614529754495
    Document type
    Journal article
    Language
    English
    Description
    There has recently been unprecedented enthusiasm in Bangladesh for Social Forestry (SF). SF projects have been launched with the goal of involving local communities in managing forest resources. Proponents claim that SF has opened new scope for people's participation in forestry. Against such promises and claims, this paper attempts to evaluate the nature and extent of participation in an SF project in Bangladesh, which is currently receiving attention from government and donors. The paper uses a systematic theoretical framework to evaluate participation in the decision-making, implementation, benefit-sharing, and evaluation of the project. It concludes that people's participation has been insignificant, and marginal. People have virtually no major involvement in project-related decisions and evaluation, but perform within strict bureaucratic limits.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>
    Pages
    7
    ISSN
    0961-4524
    EISSN
    1364-9213
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1080/09614529754495
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Journal articles

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export button (to the right?) will allow you to export the search results of the entered query to a CSV file. To export the items, click the "Export" button.

    There are two options to select the items you want to export to a CSV. Either you export all results from a search query, or you select a subset of items from the search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" in the Export menu.

    After making a selection, click the 'CSV' button. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to 'CSV'.

    The amount of items you can export is limited, but authenticating will increase this limit.