Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Marion*
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Naresh*
dc.contributor.authorReinert, Kenneth A*
dc.contributor.authorVoss, Jon E*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T09:47:05Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T09:47:05Zen
dc.date.issued1997-02-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614529754765en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130245en
dc.descriptionThis article has reference to 'Two approaches to evaluating the outcomes of development projects' and 'Rural grassroots organisations in Haiti: a case of wasted potential'.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>en
dc.format.extent11en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/viewpoint-130245
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.titleViewpointen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.countryHaitien
oxfam.subject.keywordMonitoring and evaluation
oxfam.subject.keywordM&E
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment in Practice Journal
oxfam.subject.keywordDiP
prism.number1en
prism.volume7en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record