Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBooth, David*
dc.contributor.editorEade, Deborahen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T09:46:04Zen
dc.date.available2011-05-24T09:46:04Zen
dc.date.issued1995-11-01en
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0961452951000157314en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/130195en
dc.descriptionThere is a recognised tension between the development practitioner's need for timely intelligence on key topics, and the normal routines of academic development studies. Closing that gap involves, among other things, elaborating new ways of organising and doing research. This article, by an academic, is concerned especially with how to combine interactive rapid-appraisal methods with inputs from more conventional styles of research in ways that bridge the 'macro'-'micro' divide and shed light on national policy trends by exploring community and household responses. It describes two pieces of team research carried out in Tanzania and Zambia at the instigation of the Swedish official agency, SIDA.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>en
dc.format.extent11en
dc.format.mimetypePDFen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherOxfam GBen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/bridging-the-macro-micro-divide-in-policy-oriented-research-130195
dc.subjectApproach and methodology
dc.titleBridging the 'macro'-'micro' divide in policy-oriented researchen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1364-9213en
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practiceen
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use – can be shared outside Oxfamen
oxfam.subject.countryTanzaniaen
oxfam.subject.countryZambiaen
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment methods
oxfam.subject.keywordDevelopment in Practice Journal
oxfam.subject.keywordDiP
prism.number4en
prism.volume5en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record