• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Oxfam
    • Oxfam Policy & Research
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Oxfam Digital RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountryThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication dateTypesSeriesPublisherSubjectsKeywordCountry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    About

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Food aid, scarce resources, and difficult decisions

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author(s)
    Watkins, Ben
    Editor(s)
    Eade, Deborah
    Publication date
    1992-03-01
    Subject
    Aid
    Approach and methodology
    Food and livelihoods
    Keywords
    Monitoring and evaluation
    M&E
    Development methods
    Food security
    Development in Practice Journal
    DiP
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher(s)
    Oxfam GB
    Routledge
    Journal
    Development in Practice
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10546/130096
    DOI
    10.1080/096145249100076541
    Document type
    Journal article
    Language
    English
    Description
    This article attempts to address the requirements of a methodology for evaluating food aid. It is an extension of an article by Fitzpatrick and Storey, which appeared in a recent issue of Development in Practice (Vol. 1, No. 3). The evaluation of food aid policies is considered from the perspective of a policy maker in a recipient country. Fitzpatrick and Storey analyse one particular project. But the value of evaluating one project depends on how far lessons can be learned which will influence future decisions. Is it worthwhile for a country to negotiate for food aid? Should food-aid policies be pursued, rather than others? Which particular type of food-aid policy should be followed? This article argues the case for an evaluation method that is potentially capable of facilitating these decisions. It then takes some hesitant steps towards defining a method.<p>This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis.</p>
    Pages
    8
    ISSN
    0961-4524
    EISSN
    1364-9213
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1080/096145249100076541
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Journal articles

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export button (to the right?) will allow you to export the search results of the entered query to a CSV file. To export the items, click the "Export" button.

    There are two options to select the items you want to export to a CSV. Either you export all results from a search query, or you select a subset of items from the search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" in the Export menu.

    After making a selection, click the 'CSV' button. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to 'CSV'.

    The amount of items you can export is limited, but authenticating will increase this limit.