Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2010-11-08T14:21:05Zen
dc.date.available2010-11-08T14:21:05Zen
dc.date.issued2003-05-01
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-84814-714-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10546/115059
dc.descriptionThis paper is a response from leading UK development organisations to some specific arguments put forward in support of a multilateral investment agreement (MIA) at the WTO. Rather than reiterate all the arguments against such an agreement, it challenges some particular claims put forward by proponents of an MIA. The paper demonstrates that - despite the EU's attempt to repackage it as an 'Investment for Development Framework' (IDF) - such an agreement would be against the interests of developing country members of the WTO.en_US
dc.format.extent9en_US
dc.format.mimetypePDFen_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherOxfam Internationalen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/unwanted-unproductive-and-unbalanced-six-arguments-against-an-investment-agreem-115059
dc.subjectTrade
dc.titleUnwanted, Unproductive and Unbalanced: Six arguments against an investment agreement at the WTOen_US
dc.typeBriefing paperen_US
oxfam.signoff.statusFor public use. Can be shared outside Oxfam.en_US
oxfam.subject.keywordTrade policyen_US
oxfam.subject.keywordWorld Trade Organisationen_US
oxfam.subject.keywordWTOen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-20T07:59:47Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
bp-unwanted-unproductive-unbal ...
Size:
85.24Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
English paper

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record