Monitoring and evaluating advocacy: lessons from Oxfam GB's Climate Change campaign
Starling, Simon
Starling, Simon
Citations
Altmetric:
Titre
Publication date
2010-04-01
Document type
Journal article
Pages
10
Author(s)
Advisors
Editor(s)
Other Contributors
Affiliation
ePub Date
Submitted date
Local subject classification
MeSH
Country
Collections
Description
This article examines Oxfam GB's learning from its attempts to improve monitoring and evaluation (M&E) processes within a global advocacy campaign. It outlines the Climate Change campaign team's practical experience of piloting different approaches to M&E, and the lessons emerging from the process. The experience suggests that while some 'traditional' elements of M&E are helpful in advocacy work, a greater focus on light, real-time monitoring systems is necessary. The findings highlight the organisational as well as methodological challenges of integrating M&E into advocacy campaigns: without a culture that rewards reflection and learning, improvements in staff capacities or data-collection systems will not be sustained. Indeed, the process of improving M&E practice mirrors that of an advocacy campaign itself, requiring analysis of power relations, opportunities, and constraints; monitoring of progress; and adapting plans on the basis of on-going learning. Finally, the article suggests possible ways forward, based on experience.
Language
English
Other Titles
Abstract
Citation
Journal
Development in Practice
Journal Theme
Volume
20
Issue
2
Research Unit
Table of contents
Series
ISSN
0961-4524
EISSN
1364-9213